FMCSA Moves to Make Stricter English Requirements Permanent
Staff
Published August 12, 2026


The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is taking steps to make stricter English Language Proficiency (ELP) enforcement a permanent part of federal trucking regulations, rather than leaving the policy vulnerable to future changes through agency guidance.
The proposed rule would formally codify current ELP enforcement practices, making it significantly more difficult for a future administration to reverse the requirements through a simple policy memorandum. Because federal regulations must go through a formal rulemaking process, including public notice and an opportunity for comment, changing the requirements would require a much more substantial regulatory process.
For commercial motor vehicle drivers, the move could have important consequences during roadside inspections, particularly for drivers who have difficulty communicating in English or understanding essential road signs and official instructions.
Why English Proficiency Matters in Commercial Trucking
The requirement for commercial drivers to demonstrate adequate English proficiency is not new. Federal regulations have included an English-language requirement for commercial motor vehicle drivers for decades, with the current framework requiring drivers to speak and understand English well enough to perform essential safety-related duties.
Drivers are expected to communicate with the public, understand traffic signs and signals, respond to questions from law enforcement and safety officials, and complete required reports and records in a legible manner.
The issue has historically centered less on whether the requirement existed and more on how strictly it should be enforced.
In 2016, FMCSA issued guidance that provided greater flexibility for inspectors when evaluating a driver's English proficiency. Under that approach, a driver could potentially avoid an ELP violation if communication was possible through tools such as translation applications or interpreters.
That enforcement philosophy changed significantly in 2025.
Following President Trump's executive order establishing English as the official language of the United States, the administration directed FMCSA to strengthen enforcement of existing English-language requirements for commercial drivers.
Under the stricter approach, a driver who fails to demonstrate the required level of English proficiency can be cited for an ELP violation and placed out of service (OOS).
From Agency Guidance to Federal Regulation
The distinction between guidance and regulation is at the center of FMCSA's latest proposal.
Agency guidance can influence how inspectors interpret and enforce existing regulations, but it generally can be changed without going through the full federal rulemaking process. That flexibility was at the heart of the 2016 policy shift.
FMCSA now wants to establish the stricter ELP enforcement standard directly within the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs).
If finalized, the change would give the requirement a stronger legal foundation and make enforcement more consistent across jurisdictions. It would also mean that changing the policy in the future would require another formal regulatory action rather than simply issuing a new memorandum.
For trucking companies and drivers, that could bring greater certainty about what inspectors will expect during roadside inspections.
CVSA's Role in Out-of-Service Enforcement
The Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) plays an important role in commercial vehicle enforcement across North America. Its North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria provide enforcement personnel with nationally recognized guidelines for determining when a driver or vehicle presents an immediate safety concern.
Stay Informed
Get freight market insights delivered to your inbox
Join industry professionals receiving our weekly analysis.
The treatment of English-language proficiency has changed over time.
In 2015, CVSA removed the ELP provision from its out-of-service criteria. FMCSA subsequently issued its 2016 policy memorandum, instructing its personnel to continue citing ELP violations but generally not placing drivers out of service solely because of those violations.
The enforcement environment changed again following the Trump administration's 2025 directive.
CVSA added English-language proficiency back into its out-of-service criteria, meaning drivers who fail to meet the applicable requirements can face immediate removal from service during an inspection.
CVSA later petitioned FMCSA to formally incorporate the out-of-service requirement into federal regulations. FMCSA's new proposal is designed to do exactly that.
What the Proposed Rule Would Change
Under the proposed rule, FMCSA would revise the federal regulations to explicitly recognize failure to meet English-language proficiency requirements as an out-of-service condition.
The proposal includes an exception for certain operations within the U.S.-Mexico border commercial zones, where the driver's current trip does not involve transportation that would take the driver outside those designated areas.
The broader objective is to create a consistent federal standard that does not depend solely on changes to CVSA's enforcement criteria.
If adopted, states would be expected to implement compatible requirements within their own laws and enforcement systems. FMCSA argues that this would help create uniform ELP enforcement nationwide and reduce differences in how violations are handled from one jurisdiction to another.
A Major Shift From the 2016 Approach
The proposed rule represents a significant departure from the enforcement philosophy established nearly a decade ago.
Under the 2016 policy, inspectors could identify and cite an ELP violation while generally allowing the driver to continue operating. The new approach treats inadequate English proficiency as a more immediate roadside safety issue, potentially resulting in an out-of-service order.
That difference is especially important because commercial drivers must be able to understand warnings, communicate with enforcement personnel, and respond appropriately in potentially dangerous situations.
FMCSA Administrator Derek D. Barrs has emphasized the safety implications of the stricter approach, pointing to situations in which a driver may be unable to understand critical warnings such as steep grades, runaway truck ramps or restricted-entry signs.
According to FMCSA, stricter ELP enforcement has already resulted in more than 26,000 drivers being removed from service after failing to meet the applicable requirements.
What It Means for Trucking Companies and Drivers
For motor carriers, the proposed rule could make English-language compliance an even more important part of driver qualification, onboarding and ongoing safety programs.
Companies may want to place greater emphasis on verifying that drivers can communicate effectively in English before assigning them to operate commercially. Dispatchers, safety departments and fleet managers may also need to understand how ELP violations can affect a driver's ability to remain in service.
For drivers, the message is equally clear: English proficiency is not simply a paperwork requirement. The ability to understand road signs, communicate with officials and respond to safety-related questions can directly affect whether a driver is permitted to continue a trip.
The proposal could also have broader implications for CDL training schools, recruiting companies and carriers that rely on international or multilingual driver populations, particularly as federal agencies continue increasing scrutiny of commercial driver qualifications.
A New Era of ELP Enforcement?
FMCSA's proposal is about more than changing roadside inspection procedures. It is an attempt to make the current English-language enforcement standard a lasting part of federal trucking policy.
By moving the requirement from agency guidance into federal regulation, the administration aims to prevent future policy changes from being made through simple administrative memorandums and establish a more permanent framework for enforcement.
For the trucking industry, the outcome could mean more consistent ELP enforcement, greater compliance responsibilities and potentially more out-of-service actions for drivers who fail to meet the federal standard.
As the rulemaking process moves forward, carriers and drivers will be watching closely.
Whatever the final outcome, one thing is becoming increasingly clear: English-language proficiency is once again a major focus of commercial vehicle safety enforcement in the United States.